I am so glad that the girls here on the board can help you boys out at home from time to time.
|
So red heels you do house calls
Quote:
Isaac |
Has anybody seen a post for JoePOLE ?
Quote:
Isaac |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a market such as anything else. If you are opposed to the pornographic images, don't enter the sector that they are displayed in.
But don't go hunting for pornography, hardcore or not, looking to make trouble and say that it's getting too far. If people do not like it, the producers would not make it, and obviously these things are so obscurely located that it isn't a mainstream problem and hasn't gotten out of hand so far. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You mean like alcohol and tobacco? Let me ask you a question......your husband/boyfriend/significant other cheats on you with the excuse that "I was drunk"....is that an acceptable answer or will you leave him over his actions? In other words, do you really believe alcohol made your husband do something he wasn't already thinking about? |
You mean like this guy?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So if a mind altering substance like alcohol IS NOT responsible for the delinquent activity of an individual.
Why is a non-mind altering substance like porn responsible for the delinquent behavior of someone else? Simply put, blaming human behavior on outside and inanimate objects is ludicrous regardless of the circumstances or the alleged catalyst. |
Quote:
The body is naked always, and sexual acts are as they are displayed, they don't usually change over time, and they've been just as "illicit" or demeaning as ancient times. I believe the reasoning behind the aggressive stance on nudity and sex in America was the solid foundation from Puritanical settlers with views that sexual acts were strictly to be partaken in during marriage (a religious foundation itself) and that was their own view. Whether or not you believe in these things are your own personal opinion, but in the Treaty of Tripoly (if you're familiar with the events taken place during Andrew Jackson's presidency and that period, where slave trading was soon to be abolished worldwide): "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." Almost unanimously, the Founding Fathers upheld these statements, that religion was the closing of the eye of reason, and that would be a fallacy, the downfall of the country. I'm not against your little religion, don't fret; I've only stated that this epidemic of pornography becoming such a widespread source of media in America, and also a large "problem" in the same location seems to discredit one side or the other. If you contest that there are so many people viewing pornography, committing illicit acts, then with the 85% of Americans that claim they believe in a Judeo-Christian deity, some of them have dissented from the original texts, or possibly it's not so wrong, even in God's terms. People aren't having more sex, I'm not sure of your age exactly, but if you're familiar with the Baby Boomer generation, THAT was a time where more sex was taking place, not now. Recently, there has been only a sharp decline in the amount of babies being born, despite the increasing shame taken upon those who decide to abort (a woman AND a man's decision, not the Church's). If you don't view pornography, don't. But I'm sure you don't complain about foodstuffs that you don't eat just because they're displayed in your local grocery store. You also don't enter those stores that you don't intend to purchase goods from, or are interested in; so do the same for pornography, instead of showing your ass out and making someone else's decisions for them. |
:nono:
|
Quote:
|
Thank you sweetie!
|
Use swear words sparingly, Santabot. Anywho, I can understand some of your points. Pornography is being obscured fairly well in society. The Internet is the only real problem, but we have tools for that too.
But what's your take on people who are in commited relationships viewing porn? I think if you're in a relationship, put the porn away unless you and your partner mutually agree to use it. |
He is too young to answer that question. My son had NetNanny until he was 18 on his computer.
|
Quote:
|
17 is a little young to truly understand about relationships. Sorry to disagree with you.
|
considering the views thrown about on SBLive!.. I must say I'm surprised by the poll.. a MAJORITY of SBLive views believe it to be O.K.
|
You think some people are hypocrites? LOL
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm fine Isaac, thanks for asking. Yes we try to read as many posts as we can between jobs. Although I must admit that this is one thread that I am not very interested in reading. Our system has the ability to "close" a particular thread after it has "run its course" or "served its purpose", or however you wish to say it. But I have never done so. Perhaps I will put this to a member vote someday. Time for me to get back to work! :sweatdrop:
|
Quote:
Also, I am 17, but the fact that "18+ only" doesn't stop ANYONE, especially those who seek it. I won't confirm or deny my involvement with internet-distributed pornography, but I don't see it as a problem, personally. If a child can view pornography since age 12 and still be okay, all the power to them, some do it nowadays. I've once had CyberPatrol, CyberSitter, NetNanny, and many others installed on my computer by parental types, none of which were difficult to disable with even minimal hack-like skill, I've been programming and teching since elementary school days, so I'm not unfamiliar with how to disable these types of programs. Anyway, good responses from some of you, all it takes is knowledge overall to make a better judgment, not reading someone else's opinion and accepting it as your own. EDIT: Sorry, Anime, that I didn't answer your question. I do believe it's an acceptable personal choice for either party to view pornography, no matter the relationship status, whether or not the parter agrees with it/finds out about it is between them. If you are caught lying about the topic, you're most likely to get their opinionated response, whether it be okay, negative faction, or even watching it together. I prefer a don't-ask-don't-tell style for that issue, although if someone confides to me they partake in that activity, I will understand and accept it as their own personal choice, I can't make any other than that for them, I can't personally get angry over someone's personal decisions. I can give my opinion and share my initial emotional response, but I believe I'm a more reasonable person in the realm of personal decision-making. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com