Should We Continue To Fund Our Troops?
President Bush and his Democratic opponents in Congress are squaring off in a high-decibel, high-stakes game of chicken over a bill to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
|
Hell yes we should keep funding them
Those bleeding heart liberals would do anything to bring this country down and I know our President will veto that crap. Tell them how it is George !
Isaac |
I'm with you Isaac
We can't win this war if we leave or if we stop funding our troops. If we leave all we are doing is setting the stage for another attack on our own soil - it will happen - we just don't know when.
Maybe this is what we need to stop this Democratic B...S... The next attack is not going to just kill 3000 people but many many more - STAND YOUR GROUND MR. PRESIDENT!!!!!! |
I am a patriot, and I love my country.
The fact that I believe this 'war' is going nowhere in Iraq. That I'm tired of the privatizing of this war, watching big business line it's pockets, while troops are dying, while trying to play "police". The fact that I feel the current administration has no clue on the End Game. Does Not make me a bleeding heart liberal. It's a stupid question, "Should we fund our troops?" -- NO ****. The question is do our troops need be over there anymore. Yes, I am a patriot. No, I'm not a bleeding heart liberal. No I don't want to have my taxes raised. But riddle me this. How do we plan on paying for this war ? it sure ain't free. I don't care who the heck it is.. republicans, democrats, independents.. somebody come up with a fracking plan over there besides lets throw more money and more troops at it. I've heard time and again from our Military leaders over there. There is NO MILITARY answer to the problem over there. Unless of course you want to nuke the place and start over. Which I got no problems with. But don't call me a bleeding heart liberal, because I think our troops don't need to be hanging around over there, waiting to be shot first! |
Don't hurry off as if nothing had happen RR
Quote:
Isaac |
"What Is Your Plan?"
This is a different sort of enemy that we have never fought before - Do we cut, run, tuck our tales and hope they don't stike us at home.
When they do strike what is your response and who do you go fight? What is your plan? |
Quote:
A stand for freedom ? Fight for what's right ?? How are our troops standing around, playing cop, waiting to get shot at first 'standing for freedom' ??? not to mention those people could care less about freedom, they just want the power on and the water on. No, i'm not listening to "retired-talk show hosts" military folks.. These are commmanders ON THE GROUND, saying such things. I'll use the word Patriot all I want to, thank you very much. I'm tired of having my patriotism being brought into question, because I've got my own head on my shoulders. And I don't agree with all the propaganda that gets thrown my way. I'm against the continuation of this war for some very obvious reasons. most importantly, there is no plan. But to throw more money and troops at it. That's not a solution. I have to ask why you are so FOR THIS WAR. ? Can you give me something other than a canned sound byte from talk radio ? "Fight them there so we don't have to fight them there" is the stupidest damn thing I've ever heard. I mean if it were true that would be great. If these "people" we are fighting had a country, that would make sense. Just because we fight them in Iraq doesn't keep them from our soil. These people are very patient. it was back in '93 when they bombed the World Trade Center the first time. Go forward 8 years to 9/11 and they are back again. Fighting them in Iraq, is not going to keep the few who want to sneak into this country from getting in. IF we're looking for a fight.. let's find BIN LADEN for cryin' out loud.. Let's shut IRAN UP for cryin' out loud. |
Quote:
While that's certainly not a reason to question your patriotism, it's certainly reason enough to question your logic. The last administration did nothing in the face of ever increasing attacks and the end result was a major atrocity perpetrated on our own soil. We start fighting them in their own homeland, and 6 years later, not one significant terrorist attack abroad and none on American interests. As far as a plan....it's the same plan we've always had. Remove the tyrant, establish a Democracy, defend that Democracy until it can defend itself. You want a time line when that will be completed? No problem, just get a time line from the insurgency detailing when they will stop attacking the newly established Democracy and we can't start shipping troops out the next day. |
Quote:
Go freakin' fight them in Afghanistan, at least there's a chance they might run into Bin Laden. Fighting for democracy of a country that could care less about democracy ?? We could be over there for 10 damn years, those people will still be blowing themselves up until they either STAND UP, or some dictator STANDS UP. our troops standing around playing cops, is never going to get the job done. |
Quote:
again they weren't from Iraq. Look people, I'm not about your so called "Cut bait and run" BS. You want a fight, let's go after them. Lets find Bin Laden. Lets shut IRAN the hell up. But this crap in Iraq is going to go on and on and on. Long after we leave, that country is still going to be a hell hole. |
The purpose of the War on Terror was to remove the terrorist elements from the countries with the highest terrorist occupancy which are potential threats to America. I support this effort, but I don't see why it is taking so long in Iraq. In addition, there are other terrorist countries behind Iraq too (i.e. Iran, Libia, North Korea). For all we know, this may go on for a long long time after we're done with Iraq.
|
I do agree with Brain
Quote:
God Bless America & President Bush Isaac |
Quote:
As long as our troops are standing around, manning check points and the like, they will keep blowing us up, and ON AND ON AND ON. with NO END. You got some targets. military targets. Sure lets bomb the crap out of them. Us occupying Iraq, is not keeping these terrorist who live in Saudi Arabia or anywhere else, from sneaking on a plane and causing trouble here in the U.S. if you are all so caught up in, and bought into this crap about fight them there so we don't have to fight them here.. I'm done. the propaganda machine has done it's job. The terrorists who got us on 9/11 weren't from Iraq. there are plenty of fights to be fought.. Holding Iraq up on it's feet while we get blown up IS NOT ONE OF THEM. But I guarantee, there's money being made in the process. only not by "US" |
I don't even understand what we are really arguing about. I mean, I think we want the same things. We want the bastards dead, and I mean all of them.
I simply disagree that we should be spending ALL this TIME, MONEY, LIVES bringing democracy to a country, that doeesn't want it. and never will in our lifetime. |
Well RR we can agree do disagree
Quote:
Isaac |
Quote:
Fighting this enemy is not about invading and occupying another country. It's about identifying terrorists where they are, and WIPING THEM OUT. If for example someone like the Taliban take over a country like Afghanistan, THEN sure we go in there, bomb them back to the stone age. But this crap about sitting around in Iraq with young troops playing cops on street corners, just isn't getting us anywhere. And again, I don't want to hear about spreading democracy, if they want it in Iraq, they'll get it. But they don't want it, and they surely don't want it as a handout from us. |
As long as we have people over there, they SHOULD be funded. Ya dont wanna fund em, FINE, bring em home. End of story.
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that I agree with how some of our boys are dying over there, I think we should take the gloves off and get "effective" on their @ss! No way a Iranian or Syrian insurgent is tougher, more trained, more equipped, or better in any way over our boys. We should win and win fast, but that is not the PC way. If Bush is guilty of anything, it is for living in an earlier less politicly correct world which I admit is a bit dilusional. |
Quote:
Right, no attacks since 9/11, and it was 8 years before that when they bombed the Trade Center in '93. Like I said before, they are very patient. Quote:
Quote:
|
It has done a bunch to stop the attacks
Quote:
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. --Sir Winston Churchill Hurry off alright by running home and not having the back bone to stand up to our enemies. :nono: :nono: :nono: The liberals have polluted our country and the fruit is on the vine. You can tell a vine by its fruit. Our President will stay the coarse even when the slack jawed liberals do not. Isaac Good Morning |
Should We Continue To Fund Our Troops?
YES! |
Quote:
|
Good morning RR glad to see you could make it
Quote:
Isaac |
Updated News Story
A new story has been added to the "Read More" section of this topic, as follows
CNN -- Apr 11 2007 7:52 AM No yielding on war funding as Bush proposes talks |
Updated News Story
A new story has been added to the "Read More" section of this topic, as follows
FOX NEWS -- Apr 11 2007 8:29 AM Republicans Battle Democrats Over Funding U.S. Troops in Iraq, Afghanistan |
Democrats are doing their best to bring the country down
Fancy Nancy wants to go to Iran now and try to play president again. She is for cutting our troops off and all in a attempt to hurt the GOP and try and rule this country from seat three. It is time that the power of the veto be used and support our troops. Sad times we live in when the bleeding hearts are running our country in the ground :nono: :nono:
Isaac |
God bless the soldiers!
Yes indeed we should continue funding our troops! It is absurd to think otherwise!! We should continue spiritually, mentally, physically, and fiscally supporting them and our President. Our enemies love it when we aren't in support of the troops and the president and that's very scary. We should all unite until this war is over and we are out of there.:peace:
|
Are you sure the dems are not accepting donations from Iran, Al Queda, North Korea, and BrainsmshR in order to destabilize the US gov.
|
Well spoken Pocahontas !
Quote:
God Bless our troops and their families I keep them in my prayers all the time. :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: Isaac-Saxxon |
I hate this war as much as the liberals, but we must continue to fund it. We destoyed their country, therefore we need to clean up our mess.
Bush had my vote twice, but he made a huge mistake invading Iraq. We needed to put all our efforts into finding Bin Laden. Looks like Iran is stirring things up to start a war with us and our resources are extremely low, so I don't know how we will be able to afford to go to war with a country that most likely did have something to do with 9/11. |
Yes we do need to support our troops. I am not into Bush bashing either. However, he sure is making a lot of mistakes in this last term in office.
|
I agree Isabella
Quote:
Isaac |
I think war with Iran and war with Iraq is the same war, just a larger theater is all. Maybe I'm wrong. But if we ever did go to war with Iran, I bet all of a sudden our presence in Iraq would take on a whole new meaning, while we are parked right on Iran's doorstep. Now if we never go to war with Iran, then maybe invading Iraq was a mistake and had little real benefit for Americans. My point is that everything is relative, and right now, invading Iraq looks to be a mistake. But flick a switch and it might be the smartest thing we have ever done over there. just my .02 is all.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com