That's not necessarily true, if I say something dumb, he'll take me on it, if he says something dumb, I'll do the same.

It's called "being 2 human beings and not being part of an organized religious sect that tolerates Christians but nobody else". Try it out sometime.

Hope they get better? Being homosexual is now an illness that can be "cured"?

What the ****?

I never said illness you did. You think it is OK to be a sodomite ? Yea, yea all about choice :laugh: SCIENCE has found the burned city of Sodom and Pompeii too so Tubal you make up your own mind I know what the facts are. Gay people can be very nice people and I am NOT judging their eternal soul. I do not condone their actions and I know their suicide rate is much higher than the rest of the population. Sad very sad.

For someone who claims to have been in church for a long time, that flew right over his nappy head.

I see, so once again, you're intentionally misusing terms like "phobia", which indicates fear, when there is no fear what so ever, for the sole purpose of spreading propaganda.

BTW, Leviticus 18:22 says laying with a man as one lays with a woman is an abomination. How interesting that you bible says you should view homosexuality with Extreme disgust and hatred while you merely "hope they get better".

but one shouldn't question your religious commitment or the level of understanding you have about the words you preach, right?:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

So you trust in science, but revoke Darwin's theories, widely accepted as more truthful and less porous than a religious notion. Riiight.

I know what the hell they use in communion. It's the fact that Isaac said he doesn't go to church and that in mine, we don't use motzoh and they use grape juice.

That too, plus the fact that Christians are supposed to "love thy neighbor" regardless of "thy neighbor's" life choices. A paradox!

Loving someone and liking someone and accepting someone's choices are all very different things.

Having children automatically means you're attractive? That doesn't really make sense. Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?

Haha, I'm just really boggled by your statement.

Welcome to the board TheNarrator. I see it didn't take you long to figure out Isaac is full of **** most of the time.

All TheNarrator has to do dip **** is look at your red boxes next to your lame avatar and see what everyone on this board thinks of your post. :rotflol: :rotflol: :rotflol: :rotflol: You do hang in their against all odds maybe one day we will find out where the red boxes end when you are gone or you can continue to make new avatars and post on either way your bull **** will smell the same :eek:

I don't think that having children automatically means someone is attractive. I do think that if someone is happily married, having a great sex life with their partner, etc. then SOMEONE finds them attractive and obviously attractive enough to have sex with. Now your statement was just plain stupid.

I never made any statements. I asked him two questions trying to verify if I had interpreted correctly what he had said, which was - "neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof".

I think if someone's attractive, then someone's attractive, regardless of if they have a sex life, are married, have children, or not. Just because one abstains from sex or any sort of sexual activity doesn't mean they aren't attractive.

True.

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".

It's an opinion, a choice, just like anything else, to think somebody is attractive.