Shreveport.com

Shreveport.com (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/index.php)
-   Government & Politics (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   God Bless America? (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2935)

purpahurl 10-30-2007 10:34 PM

God Bless America?
 
1 Attachment(s)
You've got to be kidding! I know he doesn't have a chance, but how in the hell did he get this far?:nono::nono:







I had heard about this but a picture is definitely worth 1000 words! God save us!!!




Respect
Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth Harkin stand during the national anthem.
Barack Hussein Obama's photo (that's his real name)......the article said he REFUSED TO NOT ONL Y PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART DURING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE.....how in the world can a man like this expect to be our next Commander-in-Chief????



.

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 06:19 AM

Barack Hussein Obama's is the far lefts poster child. I think he may be there to make Clinton look better. He is doing a good job of that. Funny how nobody will post to something like this. This passive attitude is hurting America.

Pocahontas 10-31-2007 07:51 AM

I've never seen the likes of this! Are you sure this photo is real? Since when does an American especially a presidential candidate not recite the pledge nor place his hand over his heart?? I want my president to pledge, salute, pray and behave accordingly as a citizen of the USA!:peace:

LateNight 10-31-2007 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocahontas (Post 23819)
Are you sure this photo is real?



http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp

There ya have it :cool:

joepole 10-31-2007 09:12 AM

Who cares? Nobody follows the flag code, anyway. How many do you see out in the rain? Or up at night with no spotlight?

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 09:19 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23821)
Who cares? Nobody follows the flag code, anyway. How many do you see out in the rain? Or up at night with no spotlight?

Joe I could see you not caring about this but there are many old fashion people that do like ME ! Take a look at the map and you will see just how many do care.
Attachment 1735

joepole 10-31-2007 10:38 AM

What does that map have to do with the flag code? A truck with a tattered flag on it is much more likely to have a Bush sticker on it than a Kerry sticker.

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23825)
What does that map have to do with the flag code? A truck with a tattered flag on it is much more likely to have a Bush sticker on it than a Kerry sticker.

Neither the map or Kerry have anything to do with how people vote. You may want to go back and read the post :rolleyes: It was not about the flag code that you posted about but about a presidential contender that does not think he needs to acknowledge the flag. His choice. Americas choice on how they will vote.

joepole 10-31-2007 01:21 PM

I thought the problem was he didn't do the proper ritual, not that he didn't "acknowledge the flag."

>Neither the map or Kerry have anything to do with how people vote.

Is that map not of the electoral votes in the 2004 election?

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23832)
I thought the problem was he didn't do the proper ritual, not that he didn't "acknowledge the flag."

>Neither the map or Kerry have anything to do with how people vote.

Is that map not of the electoral votes in the 2004 election?

Yes it is pole. You may not can see it but there are 4 to 1 red states being conservative Christian and yes I know about the electoral college. :laugh:
Obama needs to carry his butt back to the sand box. Would you vote for him if he gets the nomination ?

joepole 10-31-2007 02:44 PM

Where does it indicate which states on the map were "conservative Christian?"

Also, why not use a more current map like the one from the 2006 Senate races?

http://electionresources.org/images/...enate/2006.gif

Or if you're going to stick to Presidential elections, why not do one by population rather than land area? People vote, not land.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...dbluelarge.png

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 03:02 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23837)
Where does it indicate which states on the map were "conservative Christian?"

Also, why not use a more current map like the one from the 2006 Senate races?

http://electionresources.org/images/...enate/2006.gif

Or if you're going to stick to Presidential elections, why not do one by population rather than land area? People vote, not land.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...dbluelarge.png

:laugh:
Joe I did not know you could upload a graphic :clap: You did not say if you would vote for him or not ??? Oh this is not a senate race :rolleyes: Try again Joe and this time know that we are talking about the Presidents race :laugh: That twisted map you posted does not look like a Presidential map that I have ever seen. The blue states are the very reason we need better border control.
Attachment 1738
FYI this would be the 2004 election map.
Attachment 1739
FYI this would be joepole :rotflol:

Pocahontas 10-31-2007 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23821)
Who cares? Nobody follows the flag code, anyway. How many do you see out in the rain? Or up at night with no spotlight?

I care and so do many others! It appears to me to be some sort of act of defiance when every other candidate is pledging his allegiance!:flag: This will most likely cost him some supporters and for that I am glad.:rolleyes:

joepole 10-31-2007 03:52 PM

I would never vote for Obama (unless maybe the only other choice was Hilary).

Defiance is usually a good thing. Our current President is the master of it.

>That twisted map you posted does not look like a Presidential map that I have ever seen.

That's because it show votes by people, not land mass. Montana on your map is about the same size as California, yet California has about 40 times as many people. It's shown over three times the size of LA even though we have over 4 times as many people. What possible significance does the land area underneath voters matter? On my map each state is given a physical size proportional to its population, giving a more accurate representation of how the country voted that year.

I voted for Bush, but it really annoys me when people act as if a slim majority is somehow an overwhelming mandate from the citizenry. He barely squeaked by. Still, he did better than he did in 2000, at least in 2004 he won the popular vote.

You still didn't tell me which part of the map shows the number of "conservative Christians." It's certainly not the red parts.

Isaac-Saxxon 10-31-2007 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 23847)
I would never vote for Obama (unless maybe the only other choice was Hilary).

Defiance is usually a good thing. Our current President is the master of it.

>That twisted map you posted does not look like a Presidential map that I have ever seen.

That's because it show votes by people, not land mass. Montana on your map is about the same size as California, yet California has about 40 times as many people. It's shown over three times the size of LA even though we have over 4 times as many people. What possible significance does the land area underneath voters matter? On my map each state is given a physical size proportional to its population, giving a more accurate representation of how the country voted that year.

I voted for Bush, but it really annoys me when people act as if a slim majority is somehow an overwhelming mandate from the citizenry. He barely squeaked by. Still, he did better than he did in 2000, at least in 2004 he won the popular vote.

You still didn't tell me which part of the map shows the number of "conservative Christians." It's certainly not the red parts.

"Your map" looks like a liberal are exhibit. You might want to look at the agenda of the left and then the right and you will see why the GOP is under attack for being Christian. So you would vote for Obama :laugh: and you think Al Gore would have made a better President :laugh: your credibility is going down hill pole. Your funky maps and anti Christian way of thinking leaves you in the minority. Do you have any flicks of Hillary :eek:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com