Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
I know almost nothing of the specifics of this case. Is it the type of case where "DNA testing" will "get them off?" Most murders aren't.
|
I don't know the specifics either. I would expand "DNA Testing" to include all modern forensics testing. I just don't think it is very easy to fool the "Dr. Baden's" of this world like maybe it once was a decade or two ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
What "clear forensics" are they trying to debunk? I am not aware whether or not they were convicted based on any forensic evidence. Again, most cases aren't.
|
I would think that most cases have supporting forensic evidence, even if the case was not purely "based on" it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
Also, is "debunk" the right word? Debunking is a good thing, it eliminates falsehoods.
|
Probably not a good word... "twist" might be a better choice, again thinking back on the lawyers in the OJ case....