View Single Post
Old 03-03-2007, 09:47 AM   #4
rhertz
SBLive! Veteran
 
rhertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 216 rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future
I do not think John Edwards is good for our country, but such name calling is not good either. There are so many better labels for this person that do not come at the expense of homosexuals. How about Liberal, Wimp, Socialist, or my personal fav, "Greedy, Evil, and Ethically Bankrupt Trial Lawyer who wants to be President."

Ann Coulter's "Gay-dar" needs a tuneup. She must think there are no gay republican voters out there. LOL, well maybe she would be right. I'm not sure I know a single gay republican now that I think of it. Why should sexuality have anything to do with politics anyway? It seems like sexuality would be the one thing we would want to keep government out of. Another slippery slope in my opinion. But then I'm not gay, nor do I represent any special interest wanting anything whatsoever beyond wanting a "business friendly" government.
rhertz is offline   Reply With Quote