Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheNarrator
I never made any statements. I asked him two questions trying to verify if I had interpreted correctly what he had said, which was - "neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof".
I think if someone's attractive, then someone's attractive, regardless of if they have a sex life, are married, have children, or not. Just because one abstains from sex or any sort of sexual activity doesn't mean they aren't attractive.
|
Then your question still didn't make sense. A proven stud in the animal world which could directly relate to humans as well is an animal that has sired off spring. So yes children would be required.