View Single Post
Old 10-17-2007, 03:31 PM   #2
purpahurl
Advanced Member
 
purpahurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: shreveport
Posts: 377
Rep Power: 156 purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold purpahurl is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhertz View Post
I'm not sure about these. Just curious if you folks are voting for or against such measures....




I'm thinking...

1, against (reductions should always be on the table)
2, against (I don't even know what "supplimental pay" is. And "some other agencies" is too vague)
3, for (we shouldn't up any expense unless we have the money to do so)
4, for (its not the consignment shop's property to be taxed)
I'm with youHertz on the voting. Why is consignment jewelry even an issue for the legislators?

Do y'all remember the year they spent arguing over the State Jelly?
purpahurl is offline   Reply With Quote