View Single Post
Old 04-19-2007, 10:41 AM   #2
Neo
Advanced Member
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 261
Rep Power: 228 Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of Neo has much to be proud of
I read something about a month ago that organic is worse for the environment, due to:

Lower yields which require more land, more live stock.
More methane production
More manure pollution to lakes and streams

I think it comes down to what will be cost effective, efficient, and less of a pollutant.

side note: did anyone see the report that ethanol turns out to more of a pollutant and alot less efficient than gasoline!
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote