Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joepole
You left out a few important parts:
"Upon request of the petitioner or the court's own motion, the court may review the full, undisclosed documents ex parte and in camera. The court shall determine whether the summaries or redacted versions, as the case may be, are fair and accurate representations of the underlying documents."
Also, the bill only prevents the transfer of weapons, not the possession. Your seizure situation isn't valid.
|
I left out nothing. The article I posted was taken verbatim from the July '07 issue of "American Rifleman". Also, you either failed to read or comprehend the language of the bill..."It shall be unlawful for any person...to possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition."