here we go :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
|
>I could confidently take the pros of your argument and refute them
That is not "presenting both sides of an argument," that is presenting one side of an argument. |
Quote:
For example, my colleague, Joe, says that the world is flat. In defense of his theory, Joe states A, B, and C (it will help if you imagine that A, B, and C are consistent with current accepted science). Well my friends, Joe is not correct. On point A (disprove A), on point B (disprove B), and finally on point C (disprove C). This is Comp 101 Joe. |
BTW Tomoshibi, sorry to hijack your thread. I don't mean any disrespect.
|
I think "Tom" correctly assumed that everyone is by now completely familiar with the "ascension" theory, which is why he didnt bother rehashin it in his article.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Joepole 0 next round :laugh::laugh::laugh: Time for someone to go see the oracle. Attachment 1901 |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can't agree to that.
|
Quote:
BAM ! In your face !! LOL :laugh: :cool: |
Lets all just refute everything each other says, every time one of us says somethin. Wouldnt that be fun?
|
Quote:
Note how I successfully refuted that statement. Joe is now squirmin in the grip o' reason. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com