[BrainSmashR]

Originally Posted by joepole

>Then why are there so few deaths per year as a result? NHTSA says that in 2005 there were 450 deaths of children under age 5 as a result of motor vehicle accidents, 151 from unrestrained children. In 2004 (don't have 2005 data available) there were 430 drowning deaths in that same age bracket, despite the fact that there had to be millions of more opportunities to die in a car wreck than to drown.

Who would have thought that passing a car seat law would manifest itself in fewer car related deaths than a practice like swimming which has no law mandating a level of safety.....certainly not some politician who voted in favor of the law, or the constituents who voted that official into office, huh? dumbass.....

BTW, I didn't realize you considered negligent homicide, at any range, an acceptable loss. Now we can add monster to the already extensive list of adjectives used to describe what a piece of **** you are.

So how, exactly, am I a bad parent for doing something relatively safe (driving with the kid unrestrained) but not for doing something relatively dangerous (taking her to the pool)?

You intentionally and habitually break the law in front of your children endangering their lives without any sign of remorse.

You know, Joan Crawford thought she was a good parent too, but it take a lot more than putting a meal on the table everynight, scumbag.

Yes, they do. Anyone that does anything with their child endangers its life.

...but 100% of parents don't intentionally and habitually break the law by willfully and with full knowledge of their actions CHOOSING to ignore safety regulations mandated by law.

You sound like Santabot now trying to justify his drug use. You're breaking the law, period.

My children are at an acceptable level of safety. I place their lives in mortal danger every minute of every day, just as does every parent on the planet does to their children.

That's YOUR acceptable standard of safety, not the one dictated by LAW, and part of the reason you are an unfit parent.

One has to wonder if he/she has ever seen a doctor , I mean the chances of her dying from a cold versus the price of a doctor visit and the cost of medication with a cheap ass piece of **** like your for a father.

I've never argued that car seats aren't safer than no car seats, I've only argued that they protect against such an unlikely event that failure to use them (especially for a short, slow drive home) doesn't constitute enough of a danger to warrant consideration.

Translation, I'm to ****ing lazy to strap my child in and to ****ing cheap to buy a new car seat should the old one get ruined because, again, I'm to ****ing lazy to put a towel in the seat.

BTW, I'm still waiting for that contact information to turn over to the authorities. Or have you finally decided that you are INDEED intentionally and habitually breaking the law regardless of whatever childish excuses you come up with?