Toddler falls from a moving SUV

[BrainSmashR]

Originally Posted by joepole

I don't, which is why I've never committed it.

I didn't say you were guilty of the crime, stupid. I said you considered loss due to negligent homicide acceptable and unlikely. Isn't that the EXACT excuse you gave for not strapping your child in....playing the odds with her life you piece of ****.

never denied I was breaking the law. In fact, I'm pretty sure I've said several times that I knowingly violate the law. So what? Who cares if I'm breaking the law?

You mean besides the police who you continue to hide your actiosn from and EVERY SINGLE PERSON with the exception of you that's posted on this topic?

I find it equally disturbing that your wife is as careless. Do you beat her into submission or do you just smoke crack and neglect the child together?

I'm not going to get caught and even if I did it's a nothing fine. I break laws all the time: speeding, rolling stops at red lights, ordering stuff off the Internet and not notifying the state for the proper sales/use taxes, etc. So what? Since when is the law the arbiter of what is right? The state obviously doesn't think car seats make very much difference, either, since they gave not using one a penalty less than 1/5th of the penalty they give litterers.

1. Are we supposed to be surprised that a piece of **** callous enough to gamble with the life of his child is ALSO doesn't give a **** about obeying other laws?

2. The Law has the been the arbiter of what is right and wrong since the term "law" was invented.

Law:
1 a (1) : a binding custom or practice of a community : a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority

As usual, correct but irrelevant, since I never said anything about anyone breaking the law. Ignoring the law doesn't make you a bad parent any more than following the law makes you a good parent. Driving 5 blocks w/o a car seat means my kid is very, very, very, very, very likely to arrive home safely instead of very, very, very. very. very, very likely to arrive home safely. If I never left the house at all there's a very, very, very. very. very, very, very likely chance that the kid will survive, so why am I not a bad parent for taking the kid outside at all?

Well if habitual criminal activity doesn't make you an unfit parent, how about testing your theory out by providing me with contact information for the authorities.

Typical **** talker.

If I was taking ALL precautions necessary to ensure my child's safety I would have it locked in a concrete bunker 24 hours a day. Since I have decided that risking my child's life is worth it, I have to decide in what activities she is allowed to engage. Riding 5 blocks w/o a car seat is an incredibly safe act (as evidenced by the fact that so few children are injured in this manner despite so many participating) that I allow my child to engage in. Going on a parentally supervised trip to the pool is much, much more dangerous than riding 5 blocks w/o a car seat, but I let my child do that, too, because it's still incredibly safe.

Well I certainly hope I get to meet her as an adult and show her what a careless piece of **** father she has. I'm sure that will explain the disfigurment and multiple scars she'll have to endure as a direct result of your carlessness.