![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 246
|
Do you not believe that the planet is millions of years old ?
Lucy is Ethiopia's world-acclaimed archaeological find, dug up in 1974 in an almost complete hominid skeleton estimated at least 3.2 million years old. or are we dicussing something else here ?
__________________
KansasT ------------------ "Up stairs the band was playin' and the singer was singin' somethin' 'bout going home" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Not this "deep" stuff again..
Well while on the subject, this christian organization (Answers in Genesis) professes that the earth is only about 6000 years old total!http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp This includes the dinosaur period, the whole she-bang. But I'm thinking, what about carbon dating? Oh they have an answer for that.I was getting a new windshield at that glass place on Bert Kouns and someone had these AiG brochures spread around and I was bored so I read one. I had no idea that there were people who think the entire earth history is only 6000 years old. I'm a christian but I believe the earth is much older than that. Why does "creationism" and "evolution" have to be mutually exclusive? "Maybe they both exist at the same time". (quote from Forrest Gump) LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340
|
New windshield ? Can you see clearer now ?
Quote:
in the earth :-) Just kidding ! To lump the history of this planet into 6000 years of history is to be living in a box. Yea I know here we go again I guess I should stick to talking about gardening or maybe basket weaving ? Ah it was in the garden and it was not a apple but yes it was a fruit. I still can not buy into the idea we came from apes or any other evolutional process it would have to still be going on ! Always looking, Isaac-Saxxon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
Carbon Dating
Carbon dating is never used by any respectable scientist (or any scientists that I've ever heard) to date things to millions of years. C14 dating can place a formerly organic artifact at a max of about 40-60,000 years, (7-10 half-lives).
A million years would be 175 half-lives, meaning you would be working with 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0479 % of the original material, meaning about one atom left for every 20,000 tons of original material. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340
|
Well done joepole !
This is just what I was looking for ! Some input from a analytical point of view. This is something that I would not pick up studying history books.
This will change the way I look at science. Thank you ! Isaac-Saxxon |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,609
Rep Power: 290
|
Quote:
so is there a better more accurate way of dating something millions of years old ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
Dating for millions of years
Uranium-based techniques (Uranium-Thorium or Uranium-Lead) are good for old atrifacts, but aren't always doable.
Google "geochronology" for more info. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geochronology |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Quote:
I think talking about "deep subjects" is ok, as long as we keep a sense of humor and an open mind as you have today. I do believe in evolution, but I think it is more like "micro evolution" on top of "creation". I just don't see where the fossil record supports a continuous evolution from amoeba to homo sapien. Yet the concept of evolution cannot be ignored either. So maybe they are both happening at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340
|
Man 10-14 thousand years old
Quote:
are small changes in the evolution any group of genes. Seletive breeding of animals would show us that but still a limited group. I have to wonder where the "6000 year" group thinks oil came from and if it was only 6000 years old then it should renew itself ??? Oh and did you know that Gary Larson found the second Lucy ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340
|
The Earth is millions of years old
Quote:
the planet is millions of years old. My point is one word in Gen. can change the entire outlook at the Bible. The earth was made void and without form or it "became" void and with out form. I think the Bible agrees with the carbon dating but this will open a new can of worms for the red pill people. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|