Ron Paul For President

[vixweb]

Tell us Al, Since your his boy, why does Paul oppose the war in Iraq? Why does he want to re-investigate 911? Why does he oppose the patriot act? Does he think Bush knew about 911 and didn't stop it? Does he think Iraq has nothing to do with the war on terrorism? He sounds like a wacko- no matter what you say.

[Isaac-Saxxon]

I would like to know what he has to say on these same questions.

[LateNight]

To know Ron Paul's answer to either of those questions, one simply needs to look to the Constitution.

[Isaac-Saxxon]

Originally Posted by LateNight

To know Ron Paul's answer to either of those questions, one simply needs to look to the Constitution.

You trust politicians that much Well now I will want to hear him debate and see his web site. All politicians lay claim to the Constitution and yet they never agree with each other.

This will place a face with the name (Ron Paul) Kind of sounds like a Pope

[LateNight]

Originally Posted by Isaac-Saxxon

You trust politicians that much Well now I will want to hear him debate and see his web site. All politicians lay claim to the Constitution and yet they never agree with each other.
Attachment 1115
This will place a face with the name (Ron Paul) Kind of sounds like a Pope

No I don't trust politicians of any sort. But Ron Paul sounds like no politician I've ever heard.

I bet you Isaac, that other than the war in Iraq, you would be hard pressed to disagree with anything else he has to say, on any issue.

In Congress, Paul adhered to small-government conservative and libertarian principles. He has never voted to raise taxes or congressional pay and refuses to participate in the congressional pension system or take government-paid junkets.[2][3]

Paul supports free trade, tighter border security, gun ownership, and a return to free market health care. He opposes foreign interventionism, the income tax, Medicare and Medicaid, universal health care, the war on drugs, He is personally pro-life and opposed to abortion, which he thinks should not be regulated by the federal government, and thus Roe v. Wade should be overturned. He also believes that the federal government should have no influence on education.

[Isaac-Saxxon]

The war in Iraq is a key issue because this is one of the major breeding grounds for terrorist. This is the same as the people that bashed Vietnam and did not support our troops. The troops know there doing the right thing and lucky for us we have a President that does not care about the bleeding hearts and does the right thing no matter the political damage. I will keep a eye on Paul and time will tell if he will even matter at all. If he does then I will spend even more time reading about him. I do not think any president can do much with the spineless bastards we have in Congress. That is on both sides of the isle.

[Pocahontas]

Originally Posted by Isaac-Saxxon

You trust politicians that much Well now I will want to hear him debate and see his web site. All politicians lay claim to the Constitution and yet they never agree with each other.
Attachment 1115
This will place a face with the name (Ron Paul) Kind of sounds like a Pope

Yes or a drag queen! Meet RuPaul!

Sorry guys just thought I'd lighten the mood. I'll let y'all get back to debating!

[rhertz]

Originally Posted by vixweb

Tell us Al, Since your his boy, why does Paul oppose the war in Iraq? Why does he want to re-investigate 911? Why does he oppose the patriot act? Does he think Bush knew about 911 and didn't stop it? Does he think Iraq has nothing to do with the war on terrorism? He sounds like a wacko- no matter what you say.

I would be all for apposing the war in Iraq IF the President had made the following stand on 9/12:

"Hit us again and we will nuke you. Now hit us again, I dare you. I double dare you. Ok, America now back to work being normal Americans. Carry on, I've got your backs."

But of course we could never nuke someone, even if they hit us like Pearl Harbor. That would not be politicly correct. I know this because we did not nuke Osama bin Ladin in Toro Boro when we had him holed up. We did not nuke Hussein when he put a hit on George Senior. And we won't nuke Iran while they build their own nukes to distroy Israel and general terrorism.

My question is this. Does Ron Paul have what it takes to nuke Iran first if they build nukes and threaten Israel, England, or America?

[Isaac-Saxxon]

Originally Posted by rhertz

I would be all for apposing the war in Iraq IF the President had made the following stand on 9/12:

"Hit us again and we will nuke you. Now hit us again, I dare you. I double dare you. Ok, America now back to work being normal Americans. Carry on, I've got your backs."

But of course we could never nuke someone, even if they hit us like Pearl Harbor. That would not be politically correct. I know this because we did not nuke Osama bin Ladin in Toro Boro when we had him holed up. We did not nuke Hussein when he put a hit on George Senior. And we won't nuke Iran while they build their own nukes to destroy Israel and general terrorism.

My question is this. Does Ron Paul have what it takes to nuke Iran first if they build nukes and threaten Israel, England, or America?

I hope you do not get any splinters on that fence rhertz