![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
Nobody broadcasts in 1080p yet because it takes up too much bandwidth and the benefits aren't noticeable to hardly anybody.
I prefer a progressive signal of lower resolution to an interlaced signal of (sort of) higher resolution because I notice interlaced motion blur more than I notice any added clarity from the resolution, especially for something like a film transfer that comes across at 24 frames per second and has to go on a 30 or 60 fps display. 1080i and 720p are almost exactly the same amount of screen information, I just prefer it to be non-interlaced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Thanks for the info Joe. By the way, have you seen the commercial with the large chested blonde in a cowboy hat that says "It's broadcast in 1080i! I so don't know what that means, but I won't it!" Pretty funny.... Can't even remember what the commercial was for. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,609
Rep Power: 290
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|