Law Covering Sexual Contact With Students Passes House

joepole · 06-09-2007, 07:18 PM

>I did not specify freshman only, I gave you an estimate of the number of incoming freshman.

If you cannot see that contradiction then I am genuinely surprised you have the motor function to operate a computer keyboard.

>My original statement was neither misleading nor unclear in any way as we can ALL see in your quote of my text.

Correct, it was neither misleading nor unclear, it was just wrong. I corrected it. then you changed the subject.

>you are creating arguments out of nothing just for the sake of arguing

I corrected your erroneous numbers and then you began arguing against my actual, factual, legitimate numbers with ad hominem and straw man arguments.

>feel free to remind me again why you were on my ignore list in the first place.

We all know why, because I constantly correct you erroneous posts.

06-09-2007, 07:18 PM	#29
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	>I did not specify freshman only, I gave you an estimate of the number of incoming freshman. If you cannot see that contradiction then I am genuinely surprised you have the motor function to operate a computer keyboard. >My original statement was neither misleading nor unclear in any way as we can ALL see in your quote of my text. Correct, it was neither misleading nor unclear, it was just wrong. I corrected it. then you changed the subject. >you are creating arguments out of nothing just for the sake of arguing I corrected your erroneous numbers and then you began arguing against my actual, factual, legitimate numbers with ad hominem and straw man arguments. >feel free to remind me again why you were on my ignore list in the first place. We all know why, because I constantly correct you erroneous posts.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)