What's the difference between SBLive! and Shreveport

[rhertz]

Originally Posted by Isabella

geodood, it is scary electing Democrats without a plan and Glover as mayor.

Isabella, when it comes to local government, I am flexible because the mayor has a small "footprint" and local press and local citizens pretty much keep watch. But when it comes to federal government, who is watching and reporting the facts? fox? cnn? If the democrats won the house only, I could handle that. But loosing both house and senate is a bit much.

and who is Robert (Bob) Gates? I know he ran the CIA for a while but his is smart enough to out perform Rumsfeld? What will he do differently?

[joepole]

What's the difference between SBLive! and Shreveport?

Most of us have jobs and at the minimum language skills required to own and operate computers, something that would pout us in the top 10th percentile of Glover's base.

[Rough Rider]

Originally Posted by joepole

What's the difference between SBLive! and Shreveport?

Most of us have jobs and at the minimum language skills required to own and operate computers, something that would pout us in the top 10th percentile of Glover's base.

LOL ... LMAO!! you may have hit that one right on the head !

[Rough Rider]

Originally Posted by rhertz

and who is Robert (Bob) Gates? I know he ran the CIA for a while but his is smart enough to out perform Rumsfeld? What will he do differently?

Well didn't Bush senior run the CIA at some point ? I'd say that post has to be worth something.. The thing about Rumsfeld... after 9/11 when we went into Afganistan, I remember watching his press conferences and the like, I really liked Rumsfeld. He was just unfortunate enough to get stuck with this Iraq war hanging around his neck for all these years.. and as a result of the elections the other night and in the 'name of change' he got the axe.. or resigned however you want to view it.

I will wish this new guy all the luck, and hope he finds a good enough solution to get our troops out of Iraq in a timely manner, and I also hope with a good result. I do feel however, there are no good end games as far as Iraq is concerned. One reason why the first Bush NEVER went into Iraq.

[rhertz]

Originally Posted by Rough Rider

One reason why the first Bush NEVER went into Iraq.

In my opinion, this one statement is a mouthful. I think the first gulf war is related to the second. Its almost freaky. Ok, get this. George version 1 is the Commander and Chief of the first gulf war. Then Sadaam put out a hit on ole George that failed. Then George version 2 is elected President. George version 2 is the Commander and Chief of the second gulf war. What is the chance of that? Please explain?

[Isaac-Saxxon]

To tear down is what the Democrats do, not build up. They work us from within and the terrorist work us from afar. We now have clebs and the media dictating to us who will be in office. Appeasement will not make these terrorist happy EVER ! Now we have the bleeding hearts running our country while we are under attack. Voting against Bush with no plan in hand has now more than ever made out great country weak in the eyes of our enemies. Over the last 6000 years many different peoples have tried to dominate our planet and all have failed. Is there a political solution ??? Yes there is and it
is called the second Advent of Christ. Greedy, childish politicians that run our country will help to bring this to pass. When ? No man knows the day or time.
God will bless America but we must pass thru this valley of political failure to
get to the other side.
Isaac