![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 0
|
correct but radio-frequencies burning the hydrogen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
Energy is energy, it doesn't matter if it's heat, radio-frequencies, magnetic fields, or electric current. A covalent H-O-H bond takes X joules of energy (of whatever flavor) to break, and 2H2 + O2 => 2HOH releases exactly the same amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
This is kind of like saying "we can power turbines by harnessing the power of boulders rolling down mountains." Certainly true, but it neglects to take into account the energy required to get the boulders up the mountain in the first place. In the case of oil the sun and the dinosaurs* already did the work for us.
*technically not true, but oil=old dinosaurs is a popular idea |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,609
Rep Power: 290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
|
I'll be back, but I'm coming as oil!![]()
__________________
Confuscious says~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 0
|
Once the hydrogen is heated to three thousand degrees it continues to burn when exposed to the frequencies. It would take energy for the initial combustion but after that the frequencies would cause the hydrogen to burn without a need for heating. If this were theory I would laugh it off but shown to work in lab conditions.. Humm We need to know more about the radio frequency invention. It would take electricity to power this machine to separate the hydrogen and get it hot enough to burn. Then, clean renewable unlimited energy??? If only!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
If you believe that then I have a couple bridges for sale.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|