
01032008, 08:09 AM  #1  
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Rep Power: 239

Snake eats four golf balls
http://www.smh.com.au/news/unusualt...949879965.html
Quote:
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary  it's the stupid ones that need the advice. Bill Cosby 

01032008, 11:04 PM  #2 
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 248


01032008, 11:17 PM  #3 
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 236

My condolences to Joe and his fam. I hope he fully recovers.
__________________
Molon Labe! 
01042008, 08:39 AM  #4 
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
Rep Power: 239

I don't know Al it could be heredity. [yicks] I wonder if he used these kind of formulas when they were making a family.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary  it's the stupid ones that need the advice. Bill Cosby 
01042008, 09:24 AM  #5  
SBLive! Veteran

Quote:
This equation was not properly calculated. In step 3, the author chose to shift the numbers around and factor them by reversing the distributive property. Combining like terms would've been the proper means of solving the equation. If he had properly combined like terms, he would've ended up right back at "a+b=c". Therefore, step 3 was pretty much pulled out of nowhere, invalidating the rest of the equation. BUT, let's say he didn't screw up in step 3. Given the answer that the author received, the answer to this equation would be expressed as "4≠3," making the statement true and the equation solved. I hate college algebra, but I've seen quite a bit of it this past year.
__________________
Confuscious says~ 

01042008, 10:28 AM  #6 
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,691
Rep Power: 261

Why didn't they let the grotesque creature and his poor eating habits die??I hate all snakes especially really large ones!
__________________
"The greater your capacity to love, the greater your capacity to feel the pain." Jennifer Aniston 
01042008, 10:48 AM  #7 
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 248

Actually, step 3 is fine, the distributive property was used correctly.
The problem is that between 3 and 4 you divide both sides by (a + b  c) which, according to the initial equation, is 0. You can't divide by 0. 
01042008, 12:54 PM  #8  
SBLive! Veteran

Quote:
Go to http://www.algebrahelp.com/calculators/equation/ and run the equation from step 2 and you'll see what I mean. Improper calculation = invalid outcome!
__________________
Confuscious says~ 

01042008, 02:52 PM  #9 
Advanced Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 199

yeah, I like this one though. As JP says...
if a+b=c then (a+bc) = 0 So in the last step you are actually saying x divided by zero equals y divided by zero: 3/(a+bc)=4/(a+bc) or 3/0=4/0 heh, tricky 
01042008, 04:16 PM  #10  
SBLive! Veteran

Quote:
(a+bc) would equal zero. That, I can agree with, but if you are to add a 3 to one side of the equation, you must add a 3 to the other in order to keep the equation balanced, getting (3/0=3/0). This, in fact, would be a mathematical impossibility because, as Joe said, you can't divide by zero. However, discussing division is a side issue anyway, because no division took place in this equation nor should it have. So let's see where the author started. He started with this, (a+b=c), which equals zero when you rearrange it as (a+bc=0). Now, if you wanted to distribute 3 and 4 across (a+bc), you can NOT put 3 on one side and 4 on the other as the author did. This imbalances the equation so no wonder he got such an impossible outcome. When you add an element to an equation, you have to add equally to BOTH sides of the equation in order to keep it balanced, getting this (3*4(a+bc)=3*4(0)). If (a+bc) equals zero, then while following proper order of operations, this would work down to (0=0), a perfectly acceptable outcome.
__________________
Confuscious says~ 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)  
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

